Click on Semester/CourseNo. for detailed evaluation data. (Warning: some files are really large!)
Response
|
Mean and (Standard Deviation) of Responses
|
||||
Semester/Course
|
Q2
|
Q3
|
Q4
|
Q5
|
|
12/12
|
3.75
(0.97)
|
3.83
(1.34)
|
3.75
(0.75)
|
3.42
(1.31)
|
|
9/12
|
4.11
(0.78)
|
3.89
(1.17)
|
4.00
(0.71)
|
4.00
(0.87)
|
|
19/23
|
4.37
(0.68)
|
3.79
(0.79)
|
4.37
(0.50)
|
4.26
(0.65)
|
|
3/6
|
3.67
(1.53)
|
4.33
(0.58)
|
4.00
(1.73)
|
3.33
(0.58)
|
|
10/15
|
4.20
(0.63)
|
3.80
(1.14)
|
4.60
(0.52)
|
3.60
(1.17)
|
|
10/10
|
4.30
(0.67)
|
4.60
(0.52)
|
4.40
(0.70)
|
4.20
(0.79)
|
|
Question Text
|
Scale
|
||||
Q2 I would rate the
instructor’s explanation of the course content as:
|
1= Very Confusing
5= Very Clear
|
||||
Q3 I would rate the
instructor’s concern about my progress in the course as:
|
1= Very Unconcerned
5= Very Concerned
|
||||
Q4 I would rate the
instructor’s organization of the course material as:
|
1= Very Disorganized
5= Very Organized
|
||||
Q5 Compared to other
instructors I have had at Ball State University, I would rate this instructor
as:
|
1= Much Worse
5= Much Better
|
||||
This is a summary of my evaluations that were conducted according to the old paper-based evaluation system. Evaluations were completed during a class session near the end the semester (conducted by a GA), so response rates were generally fairly high. You may be wondering why I don't list the results of Question 1. That was just a Yes/No question asking the student if the evaluation was conducted according to the proper procedure. Because the evaluations were conducted in class, no evaluations were conducted for internship-related courses.